There are contains of fallacies
in article SPM EXAM : Better As needed, not more As by P.Nathan, Kuala Lumpur ,
NST.
The first fallacies found is
regarding to the hasty generalization. Based on claim “Many Malaysians are
sceptical about the rosy examination results released year after.” on paragraph
2, the conclusion is invalid and weak. This is because the evident is based on
a sample that is not large enough. Making
assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a small usual
resemble weak claim.
Taking on argument “there is a
strong belief that the result have been adjusted to make them acceptable to the
public” on paragraph 3. There is defect in this argument. The argument attempts to appeal to pity. This
is because the arguer tries to accept conclusion by making them feel sorry for
someone. Upon that, the argument also focused more on the emotional fact rather
than the evident itself which clearly prove that it is unreliable and weak.
“Critics say it is simply
impossible to score 16 1As unless the passing marks we set ridiculously low”
was taken on paragraph 4. This claim is to be subjected to contain fallacy on
it. It shows that the fallacy is appeal to authority. This is due to that the
claim attempts to used “critics” as a reference to support his claim.
Supporting a claim by citing an authority who lacks of expertise on that
particular issue is obviously prove that it is not be well supported.
Accordant to conclusion in
paragraph 5 “there is even a story circulating of a student who was sent back
to Malaysia after having failed an entrance examination” this shows to be
appealed to fear. There are elements of fear and prejudice in it. The writer
attempts to create support for their conclusion by the existing of emotional
contact on it which is fear and prejudice. Therefore, it is to be concluded
that the evident is not strong enough to be valid.
More over there is also a personal
attack found in paragraph 5 “that particular student was reputed to have scored
16 1As in the SPM examination.” The
argument focuses more attention on personal characteristic rather on the
argument. They seek to discredit opinions by discrediting those who the writer
attacks to. It is not necessary to use personal characteristic to make one
evident valid.
On paragraph 6, the conclusion
“our education should come up with a grading system that is progressive, not one
that chums out scores of 1As-scoring students who might actually be mediocre”
shows to have weak analogy. This is
because conclusion relies on analogy between two or more ideas. The comparison
with those two ideas is not relevant, thus making the conclusion weak.
Above is sample of my assignment regarding to fallacies analysis. I don't know whether I got it right or not. My lecturer told me to do as I please, so here is it. Gonna submit it today. and I mean know, at the moment I'm using internet service provided by KFC. Luckily the connection and is pretty nice.